Gender,
sexual orientation, skin color and ethnicity are accidents at birth,
not an entitlement for lifelong victimhood.
The PIG Doctrine
CRIME
& PUNISHMENT IN THIS
ERA OF GENDER "EQUALITY"
Criminal
rape has been expanded to include Date Rape, a crime based on consensual
sexual intercourse between a male and a female. It entails the female
doing one of the following:
(1)
Consented while intoxicated,
or
(2)
Consented due to the persuasiveness of her 'rapist',
or
(3)
Consented, seemed to enjoy, but later came to regret the act.
The
third item on this list is, by far, the most ingenious NO-NAD-perpetrated
contribution to criminology. They added a new crime, date rape (a.k.a.
acquaintance rape), defining it as any consensual sexual intercourse
that the female comes to regret...afterwards. In practice, this
means that if, at any time in her life, one of a man's former, female
sexual partners comes to regret their sexual interlude, she can
redefine this sexual union as 'rape'. This type of rape does not
require the use of, or threat of, force on the part of the male.
It is rape because she so defines it.
PIG
is more than a little disappointed that the 'Sisterhood' didn't
take item three to it's logic extreme. We, respectfully, suggest
they add the following new crimes to a woman's arsenal. Following
in the footsteps of Date Rape, why not:
DATE
GRAND THEFT AUTO:
Ms.
Victim: You see, your honor, we decided to go out to a movie,
and I asked him to drive my car. But, afterwards, I decided that
was wrong because he didn't reset the seat properly and he didn't
set the parking brake when we got home. Therefore, I withdraw my
consent; He stole my car.
DATE
KIDNAPPING:
Ms.
Victim: Yes, your honor, I did agree to go out to dinner
with him and, at the time, I seemed to enjoy it. But, the next day
when I thought about the snooty waitress, the overpriced food and
the disgusting music, I really regretted the whole experience so
much, I'm sorry I went with him. I withdraw my consent; He kidnaped
me, your honor.
Looking
to the Future of Feminist Criminology in the 21st Century
Catherine
MacKinnon, and other visionary feminists, include male sexual fantasies,
male-oriented erotica - erotica with women as the focus of male
desire - and any other unspoken, inner, sexual thought about women
as rape, criminal rape...lock the bastard up and throw away the
key rape. An appropriate name for this would be Thought Rape.
In
her book, 'Only Words', MacKinnon sets out a detailed argument that
Thought Rape is a real life crime. The smoking gun, for MacKinnon,
is the fact that sexual images, written or visual, arouse men...give
them an erection. Since men can, and invariably do, derive some
form of sexual satisfaction from this imagery, they have, by MacKinnon's
definition, participated in the acts themselves. The man has, she
insists, forced the women portrayed in the imagery...forced all
women, to perform sexually with him. He has, she declares, just
raped the women portrayed. By extension, MacKinnon concludes, he
has raped all women.
Let's
explore the fascinating ramifications of Thought Rape:
A
dude is watching Rear Window and starts getting 'warmies' for Grace
Kelly, a woman who could give a cadaver the warmies. According to
MacKinnon and her feminist cohorts, our dude just raped Grace Kelly.
Since sweet Grace has been room temperature for years, he's not
only guilty of rape, he's also guilty of necrophilia!
If
I understand MacKinnon's assertion, any time a dude 'throws wood',
he's committing a crime. Before we accept this 'woody as the smoking
gun of male criminal behavior' assertion, we should explore the
implications more fully.
The
sad truth is that dudes can throw wood, anywhere, any time, over
damn near anything. I know dudes who go into serious heat over a
well-polished door knob. Show most dudes a new Corvette and you'll
see some real 'woody' action.
If
MacKinnon's Thought Rape is added to the criminal codes, with 'packing
wood' as the smoking gun, Amerika can't build jails fast enough
to house this tidal wave of criminals. I suppose we need to name
this crime: 'Unlawful Carnal Knowledge of an Inanimate Object'.
PIG
is shocked that, once again, The Sisterhood has stopped short, when
exploring the full potential of this new area of criminal behavior.
Why stop at Thought Rape?
We
begin with another of MacKinnon's smoking guns. This one involves
a dude getting 'emotionally involved' in the imagery he's consuming.
By this standard, we must take the next logical step from Thought
Rape, to Thought Murder:
Let's
say dude enjoys murder mysteries, watches action shows/movies or
subjects himself to horror/slasher movies. Let's further state that
the imagery in question employs women as murder victims. The instant
the dude becomes emotionally involved in this crime, he's a murderer.
PIG
will trust all of you guilty dudes to do the right thing and turn
yourselves in to the proper authorities. Far
be it from a lowly male to offer unwanted advice to The Sisterhood,
but, if you insist on starting down the path of redefining male
criminal behavior, you must have the 'NADs' to see it through to
the bitter end.
Just
a suggestion, babes.
T. D. Treat
|